AutismInsights
Back to research database
Emerging

Bridging the Gap in Autism Diagnosis: An Evaluation of a Novel Primary Care Training Model.

Journal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics : JDBP2025

Bickel Julie, Hatoun Jonathan, Fry Margaret, Prock Lisa, Vernacchio Louis, Patane Laura Burckett, Coop Ashley, Weitzman Carol

What this study means for families

Researchers trained family doctors to better diagnose autism in toddlers aged 18-36 months. After an 8-session training program, doctors felt much more confident and comfortable diagnosing autism at all severity levels. They also improved their skills in taking autism histories, observing children, and talking to families about results. This training could help more children get diagnosed earlier by their regular doctors.

Summary by AutismInsights from published abstract. This is not a substitute for reading the original paper.

Research summary

This study evaluated an 8-session training program for primary care clinicians to diagnose autism in children aged 18-36 months. Thirty-five PCCs completed the 9-month training, with 29 providing complete survey data. At baseline, 89% had no specialized autism training, yet 31% had diagnosed autism in the past year. Post-training, clinicians reported significantly increased comfort diagnosing mild, moderate, and severe autism.

They also showed improved knowledge and competence in autism evaluation components including history-taking, structured observation, rating scale scoring, documentation, and family communication. The study suggests primary care training can enhance early autism diagnosis capacity and improve service access.

Summary by AutismInsights from published abstract. This is not a substitute for reading the original paper.

Key findings

  • 1

    PCCs showed significant increases in comfort diagnosing autism across all severity levels (mild: 2.31 vs 3.02, moderate: 3.03 vs 3.83, severe: 3.45 vs 4.34, all p<0.001)

    Confidence: moderateRelevance: Demonstrates training can meaningfully improve clinician confidence in autism diagnosis
  • 2

    89% of PCCs had no prior specialized autism training, yet 31% had diagnosed autism in the past year

    Confidence: strongRelevance: Highlights gap between training and practice demands in primary care
  • 3

    Training improved competence in all evaluation components including history-taking, observation, rating scales, and family communication

    Confidence: moderateRelevance: Comprehensive skill improvement suggests effective training model

Summary by AutismInsights from published abstract. This is not a substitute for reading the original paper.

Clinical implications

Primary care training programs can enhance clinician confidence and competence in early autism diagnosis. This approach could reduce diagnostic delays and improve access to early intervention services. However, effectiveness should be validated through controlled studies measuring diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes.

Summary by AutismInsights from published abstract. This is not a substitute for reading the original paper.

Limitations

Single-group pre-post design without control group limits causal inference. Self-reported measures may overestimate training effects. No follow-up data on actual diagnostic accuracy or long-term retention of skills. Small sample size and unclear generalizability to broader primary care settings.

Summary by AutismInsights from published abstract. This is not a substitute for reading the original paper.

Original abstract

The current study assesses the impact of an educational program designed to train primary care clinicians (PCCs) to diagnose children between age 18 and 36 months at high risk for autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Two cohorts of PCCs completed an 8-session training over a 9-month period. Clinicians were surveyed at baseline and 3 months after training completion. Information was collected regarding PCCs knowledge of ASD, their diagnostic beliefs, and perceived comfort and competence regarding all aspects of an ASD diagnostic evaluation.

A total of 35 participants completed training, and 29 (82%) completed presurvey and postsurvey. At baseline, 89% of PCCs reported no additional training in developmental behavioral pediatrics or diagnosing children with ASD, although 31% had diagnosed a child with ASD in the past year. After training, PCCs reported significantly greater comfort diagnosing ASD in children between age 18 and 36 months with mild ASD (2.31 vs 3.02, p < 0.0001), moderate ASD (3.03 vs 3.83, p < 0.001), and severe ASD (3.45 vs 4.34, p < 0.0001). PCCs also reported a significant increase in their knowledge and perceived competence in completing an autism evaluation, including taking an autism history, completing a structured observation, scoring the Childhood Autism Rating Scale-Second Edition, writing a letter of medical necessity, and discussing findings with families.

After training, PCCs reported a significant improvement in their knowledge, comfort, and competence regarding all aspects of diagnosing young children 18 to 36 months of age at high risk of ASD. PCCs can help to improve access to services for young children at risk for ASD.

View Original Paper

View original paperFull paper via publisher (may require subscription)

Evidence Grade

Emerging

limited

Grade assigned by AutismInsights based on study type and published abstract.

Study Details

Journal
Journal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics : JDBP
Year
2025
PMID
40879428
DOI
10.1097/DBP.0000000000001417

MeSH Terms

HumansAutism Spectrum DisorderChild, PreschoolPrimary Health CareInfantMaleFemaleClinical CompetenceAdultHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice