AutismInsights
Back to research database
Emerging

Short-term and Long-term Stability of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS-2) Calibrated Comparison Scores (CCS) and Classification Scores in Youth with Down Syndrome or Fragile X Syndrome with Intellectual Disability.

Journal of autism and developmental disorders2026

Thurman Angela John, Nunnally Amanda Dimachkie, Nguyen Vivian, Berry-Kravis Elizabeth, Sterling Audra, Edgin Jamie, Hamilton Debra, Aschkenasy Jeannie, Abbeduto Leonard

What this study means for families

Researchers studied how consistent autism assessments are over time in children with Down syndrome or Fragile X syndrome. They found that autism test scores stayed fairly consistent, but autism diagnoses sometimes changed between visits, especially for children with Down syndrome. Children whose diagnoses changed tended to have milder autism symptoms and better language skills.

Summary by AutismInsights from published abstract. This is not a substitute for reading the original paper.

Research summary

This longitudinal study examined the reliability of ADOS-2 autism assessments in 166 youth with Down syndrome (76 participants) or Fragile X syndrome (90 participants) who also had intellectual disability. Researchers assessed participants at three time points to evaluate short-term and long-term consistency of autism measures. While calibrated comparison scores showed good consistency over time in both groups, repetitive behavior scores were less reliable, particularly in Down syndrome. ASD classifications varied significantly over time, especially in the Down syndrome group.

Participants with variable classifications had lower autism severity scores and stronger language abilities compared to those with stable ASD classifications.

Summary by AutismInsights from published abstract. This is not a substitute for reading the original paper.

Key findings

  • 1

    ADOS-2 calibrated comparison scores showed good short-term and long-term consistency in both Down syndrome and Fragile X syndrome groups

    Confidence: moderateRelevance: Supports reliability of ADOS-2 severity measures in these populations
  • 2

    Repetitive behavior scores showed lowest reliability, particularly in Down syndrome group

    Confidence: moderateRelevance: Suggests need for careful interpretation of repetitive behavior assessments
  • 3

    ASD classifications varied significantly over time, with higher variability in Down syndrome than Fragile X syndrome

    Confidence: moderateRelevance: Indicates diagnostic instability that may impact service planning
  • 4

    Participants with variable classifications had lower autism severity scores and higher language abilities

    Confidence: moderateRelevance: Identifies factors associated with diagnostic instability

Summary by AutismInsights from published abstract. This is not a substitute for reading the original paper.

Clinical implications

Results suggest ADOS-2 provides reliable severity measures but diagnostic classifications may vary over time, particularly in Down syndrome. Clinicians should consider language abilities and autism severity when interpreting assessments and making diagnostic decisions in these populations.

Summary by AutismInsights from published abstract. This is not a substitute for reading the original paper.

Limitations

Study limitations include unclear methodology details, unknown sample size specifications, and lack of information about assessment intervals. The abstract does not provide details about participant demographics beyond age and gender distribution.

Summary by AutismInsights from published abstract. This is not a substitute for reading the original paper.

Original abstract

Autism diagnosis in individuals with fragile X syndrome (FXS) or Down syndrome (DS) with co-occurring intellectual disability is complex since clinicians often must consider other co-occurring behavioral features. Understanding how best to assess the features of autism in individuals with these conditions is crucial. In this study, we consider the short-term and long-term psychometric consistency of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-2 (ADOS-2) calibrated comparison scores (CCSs) and ASD classifications in individuals with FXS or DS. 76 individuals with DS (39 males; M = 15.27) and 90 individuals with FXS (71 males; M = 14.52 years) completed an assessment battery (ADOS-2, abbreviated IQ assessment and semi-structured language sample) at three timepoints (initial visit, short-term stability visit, long-term stability visit). All CCSs were found to have short-and long-term consistency for both groups, with lowest reliability scores for the repetitive behaviors (RRB) CCSs.

Decreased reliability of RRB CCSs was found in the DS group than the FXS group. Variable short- and long-term ASD classifications were observed in both groups, with significantly higher variability in the DS group. Across groups, participants with variable classifications had lower ADOS-2 CCSs and higher language scores than those with stable ASD classifications. In the FXS group, those with variable classifications earned higher cognitive scores than did participants with stable ASD classifications.

These findings highlight the high incidence of autism symptomatology in individuals with DS or FXS and co-occurring intellectual disability, while elucidating the short- and long-term variability of symptom expression in the context of structured observational tasks such as the ADOS-2.

View Original Paper

View original paperFull paper via publisher (may require subscription)

Evidence Grade

Emerging

moderate

Grade assigned by AutismInsights based on study type and published abstract.

Study Details

Journal
Journal of autism and developmental disorders
Year
2026
PMID
39251531
DOI
10.1007/s10803-024-06535-8

MeSH Terms

Reproducibility of ResultsHumansMaleFemaleAdolescentPsychometricsIntellectual DisabilityDown SyndromeFragile X SyndromeLanguage TestsSymptom AssessmentAutism Spectrum Disorder