AutismInsights
Back to research database
Emerging

Genetic Diagnostic Yield in Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and Epilepsy Phenotypes in Children with Genetically Defined ASD.

Journal of autism and developmental disorders2025

Lob Karen, Sawka Danielle M, Gaitanis John N, Liu Judy S, Nie Duyu A

What this study means for families

Researchers studied 523 children with autism to compare different genetic tests and look at seizure patterns. They found that a more comprehensive genetic test (whole exome sequencing) was better at finding genetic causes than simpler tests. About 15% of children had a genetic cause identified. Children with genetic causes of autism were more likely to have seizures (35% vs 16%), and their seizures started earlier (around age 2 vs age 5).

These children also had more physical features like smaller heads and muscle weakness.

Summary by AutismInsights from published abstract. This is not a substitute for reading the original paper.

Research summary

This retrospective study of 523 children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) investigated genetic testing diagnostic yields and epilepsy phenotypes. Whole exome sequencing (WES) demonstrated superior diagnostic yield compared to chromosomal microarray (23.0% vs 8.3%). Overall, 15.1% of children received a genetic diagnosis explaining their ASD. Children with genetically defined ASD showed significantly higher rates of microcephaly, hypotonia, dysmorphic features, and developmental delay/regression.

Notably, epilepsy prevalence was significantly higher in genetically defined ASD (35.4% vs 16.4%), with earlier onset (median 2.2 vs 5.0 years) and trends toward increased drug resistance. The findings support WES as first-tier genetic testing for ASD and highlight the importance of early genetic diagnosis for informing surveillance and management of comorbid conditions.

Summary by AutismInsights from published abstract. This is not a substitute for reading the original paper.

Key findings

  • 1

    Whole exome sequencing achieved 23.0% diagnostic yield versus 8.3% for chromosomal microarray

    Confidence: moderateRelevance: Supports WES as superior first-tier genetic testing approach for ASD diagnosis
  • 2

    Children with genetically defined ASD had significantly higher epilepsy prevalence (35.4% vs 16.4%)

    Confidence: moderateRelevance: Genetic ASD diagnosis indicates increased seizure risk requiring enhanced monitoring
  • 3

    Earlier epilepsy onset in genetically defined ASD (median 2.2 vs 5.0 years)

    Confidence: moderateRelevance: Early genetic diagnosis enables proactive seizure surveillance in younger children
  • 4

    Higher association with microcephaly, hypotonia, and dysmorphic features in genetically defined ASD

    Confidence: moderateRelevance: Physical features may guide genetic testing prioritization and comprehensive assessment

Summary by AutismInsights from published abstract. This is not a substitute for reading the original paper.

Clinical implications

WES should be considered first-tier genetic testing for ASD. Early genetic diagnosis enables proactive epilepsy monitoring and management planning. Children with genetic ASD diagnoses require enhanced surveillance for seizures, particularly in early childhood. Physical phenotyping can inform genetic testing decisions and comprehensive care approaches.

Summary by AutismInsights from published abstract. This is not a substitute for reading the original paper.

Limitations

Single-center retrospective design limits generalizability. Sample size for specific genetic variants not detailed. Drug-resistant epilepsy comparison did not reach statistical significance. Long-term outcomes and management responses not assessed.

Summary by AutismInsights from published abstract. This is not a substitute for reading the original paper.

Original abstract

We compared the epilepsy phenotypes in children with genetically defined versus undefined autism spectrum disorder (ASD). A single-center retrospective study was conducted to investigate diagnostic yields of different genetic testing for children with ASD. Patients with at least one testing modality were included and classified as having genetically defined ASD or not based on updated genotype-phenotype correlation. Of the 523 patients included, 79 (15.1%) had results explaining their ASD diagnosis.

WES (whole exome sequencing) outperformed CMA (chromosomal microarray) on diagnostic yield (23.0% versus 8.3%). Compared to those with non-diagnostic test(s), children with genetically defined ASD were associated with higher rates for microcephaly, hypotonia, dysmorphic features, and developmental delay/regression. The prevalence of epilepsy was significantly higher in children with genetically defined ASD than those without a genetic diagnosis (35.4% versus 16.4%, p < 0.001, power = 0.97). Furthermore, children with genetically defined ASD had a younger age of epilepsy onset (median 2.2 versus 5.0 years, p = 0.002, power = 0.90) and a higher rate of drug-resistant epilepsy although not reaching statistical significance (35.7% versus 21.9%, p = 0.20).

Our study has provided further evidence to support WES as first-tier test for children with ASD and that an early genetic diagnosis has the potential to inform further surveillance and management for ASD comorbid conditions including epilepsy.

View Original Paper

View original paperFull paper via publisher (may require subscription)

Evidence Grade

Emerging

moderate

Grade assigned by AutismInsights based on study type and published abstract.

Study Details

Journal
Journal of autism and developmental disorders
Year
2025
PMID
39136901
DOI
10.1007/s10803-024-06512-1

MeSH Terms

HumansAutism Spectrum DisorderMaleFemaleEpilepsyChild, PreschoolPhenotypeChildRetrospective StudiesGenetic TestingAdolescentExome SequencingGenetic Association Studies