AutismInsights
Back to research database
Emerging

Removal of site effects and enhancement of signal using dual projection independent component analysis for pooling multi-site MRI data.

The European journal of neuroscience2023

Hao Yuxing, Xu Huashuai, Xia Mingrui, Yan Chenwei, Zhang Yunge, Zhou Dongyue, Kärkkäinen Tommi, Nickerson Lisa D, Li Huanjie, Cong Fengyu

What this study means for families

Researchers developed a better way to combine brain scans from different hospitals and research centres. When studying conditions like autism, combining data from multiple sites creates larger, more reliable datasets. However, different scanners can create confusing differences in the data. This new method better removes these technical differences while keeping the important brain information intact, making autism research more accurate.

Summary by AutismInsights from published abstract. This is not a substitute for reading the original paper.

Research summary

This methodological study developed a dual projection independent component analysis (DP-ICA) harmonisation method to improve the pooling of multi-site MRI datasets in neuroscience research. The challenge addressed is that scanner/site variability can confound results when combining neuroimaging data across different research sites. The DP-ICA method aims to more completely remove site effects while preserving signals of interest, even when these are correlated with site variables. Testing on simulated data, autism brain imaging datasets from ABIDE II, and travelling subject data demonstrated superior performance compared to conventional harmonisation methods in removing site effects and enhancing detection sensitivity.

Summary by AutismInsights from published abstract. This is not a substitute for reading the original paper.

Key findings

  • 1

    DP-ICA harmonisation demonstrated superior performance compared to conventional methods for removing scanner/site effects in multi-site MRI studies

    Confidence: moderateRelevance: Enables more reliable pooling of autism neuroimaging data across research sites
  • 2

    The method enhanced sensitivity to detect signals of interest while preserving important neurobiological information

    Confidence: moderateRelevance: May improve detection of autism-related brain differences in multi-site studies
  • 3

    Method successfully handled cases where signals of interest and site effects are correlated

    Confidence: moderateRelevance: Addresses common methodological challenges in autism neuroimaging research

Summary by AutismInsights from published abstract. This is not a substitute for reading the original paper.

Clinical implications

This harmonisation method could improve the reliability of multi-site autism neuroimaging research, potentially leading to more robust findings about brain differences in autism and better reproducibility of research results across different centres.

Summary by AutismInsights from published abstract. This is not a substitute for reading the original paper.

Limitations

This is primarily a methodological validation study. The clinical impact and generalisability across different autism populations and neuroimaging protocols requires further validation. Sample sizes for testing datasets were not reported.

Summary by AutismInsights from published abstract. This is not a substitute for reading the original paper.

Original abstract

Combining magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data from multi-site studies is a popular approach for constructing larger datasets to greatly enhance the reliability and reproducibility of neuroscience research. However, the scanner/site variability is a significant confound that complicates the interpretation of the results, so effective and complete removal of the scanner/site variability is necessary to realise the full advantages of pooling multi-site datasets. Independent component analysis (ICA) and general linear model (GLM) based harmonisation methods are the two primary methods used to eliminate scanner/site effects. Unfortunately, there are challenges with both ICA-based and GLM-based harmonisation methods to remove site effects completely when the signals of interest and scanner/site effects-related variables are correlated, which may occur in neuroscience studies.

In this study, we propose an effective and powerful harmonisation strategy that implements dual projection (DP) theory based on ICA to remove the scanner/site effects more completely. This method can separate the signal effects correlated with site variables from the identified site effects for removal without losing signals of interest. Both simulations and vivo structural MRI datasets, including a dataset from Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange II and a travelling subject dataset from the Strategic Research Program for Brain Sciences, were used to test the performance of a DP-based ICA harmonisation method. Results show that DP-based ICA harmonisation has superior performance for removing site effects and enhancing the sensitivity to detect signals of interest as compared with GLM-based and conventional ICA harmonisation methods.

View Original Paper

View original paperFull paper via publisher (may require subscription)

Evidence Grade

Emerging

emerging

Grade assigned by AutismInsights based on study type and published abstract.

Study Details

Journal
The European journal of neuroscience
Year
2023
PMID
37649141
DOI
10.1111/ejn.16120

MeSH Terms

HumansReproducibility of ResultsMagnetic Resonance ImagingAutistic DisorderBrainNeurosciences