AutismInsights
Back to research database
EmergingReview

Review of Progress in Diagnostic Studies of Autism Spectrum Disorder Using Neuroimaging.

Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences2023

Kaur Palwinder, Kaur Amandeep

What this study means for families

This review looked at brain imaging studies for autism diagnosis over the past 20 years. Researchers are using brain scans (MRI) combined with computer programs to find biological signs of autism in the brain. Currently, autism is diagnosed through behavioral observations and interviews. The goal is to use brain imaging to help diagnose autism earlier and more accurately. The studies looked at brain thickness, size, and how different brain areas connect with each other.

Summary by AutismInsights from published abstract. This is not a substitute for reading the original paper.

Research summary

This review examined two decades of neuroimaging research for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) diagnosis. The authors analyzed studies using structural and functional MRI combined with machine learning approaches to identify biological markers for ASD. They categorized neuroimaging studies into three types: brain thickness, volume, and functional connectivity studies. The review highlights how advanced computational methods are being applied to neuroimaging data to potentially improve early ASD diagnosis beyond current behavioral assessment tools like ADOS and ADI-R.

The authors also developed a lightweight CNN model achieving high classification accuracy, though this represents a single computational approach rather than validated clinical practice.

Summary by AutismInsights from published abstract. This is not a substitute for reading the original paper.

Key findings

  • 1

    Neuroimaging studies can be categorized into three main types: brain thickness, volume, and functional connectivity studies

    Confidence: moderateRelevance: Provides framework for understanding different neuroimaging approaches to autism research
  • 2

    Machine learning and deep learning approaches combined with neuroimaging may help identify biological markers for early ASD diagnosis

    Confidence: emergingRelevance: Potential to supplement current behavioral diagnostic methods with biological markers
  • 3

    A lightweight CNN model achieved 99.92% accuracy in ASD classification in this study

    Confidence: limitedRelevance: Represents preliminary computational proof-of-concept rather than validated clinical tool

Summary by AutismInsights from published abstract. This is not a substitute for reading the original paper.

Clinical implications

While neuroimaging combined with machine learning shows promise for identifying biological markers of autism, these approaches remain in early research stages. Current clinical practice should continue relying on established diagnostic tools like ADOS and ADI-R. Future research may lead to complementary biological diagnostic methods.

Summary by AutismInsights from published abstract. This is not a substitute for reading the original paper.

Limitations

This is a review article without reported sample sizes or systematic methodology details. The high CNN accuracy represents a single model's performance rather than validated clinical practice. No information provided about study selection criteria, quality assessment, or generalizability of findings across populations.

Summary by AutismInsights from published abstract. This is not a substitute for reading the original paper.

Original abstract

This review article summarizes the recent advances in the diagnostic studies of autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) considering some of the most influential research articles from the last two decades. ASD is a heterogeneous neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by abnormalities in social interaction, communication, and behavioral patterns as well as some unique strengths and differences. The current diagnosis systems are based on autism diagnostic observation schedule (ADOS) or autism diagnostic interview-revised (ADI-R), but biological markers are also important for an effective diagnosis of ASDs. The amalgamation of neuroimaging techniques, such as structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI and fMRI), with machine-learning and deep-learning approaches helps throw new light on typical biological markers of ASDs at the early stage of life.

To assess the performance of a deep neural network, we develop a light-weighted CNN model for ASD classification. The overall accuracy, precision, and F1-score of the proposed model are 99.92%, 99.93% and 99.92%, respectively. All the neuroimaging studies we have reviewed can be divided into 3 categories, viz. thickness, volume and functional connectivity-based studies. We conclude with a discussion of the major findings of considered studies and promising directions for future research in this field.

View Original Paper

View original paperFull paper via publisher (may require subscription)

Evidence Grade

Emerging

emerging

Grade assigned by AutismInsights based on study type and published abstract.

Study Details

Type
Review
Journal
Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences
Year
2023
PMID
36633792
DOI
10.1007/s12539-022-00548-6

MeSH Terms

HumansAutism Spectrum DisorderNeuroimagingMagnetic Resonance ImagingAutistic DisorderBiomarkers