AutismInsights
Back to research database
Emerging

Expert consensus regarding indicators of a traumatic reaction in autistic youth: a Delphi survey.

Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines2023

Kerns Connor M, Robins Diana L, Shattuck Paul T, Newschaffer Craig J, Berkowitz Steven J

What this study means for families

Experts agree that trauma in autistic children may look different than in other children and is often missed. They identified 22 important signs including typical trauma symptoms (nightmares, avoiding reminders) but also autism-specific changes like becoming more dependent on others, losing previously learned skills, and self-harm behaviors. The experts stressed that assessing trauma in autistic children requires specially designed tools and input from multiple people who know the child.

Summary by AutismInsights from published abstract. This is not a substitute for reading the original paper.

Research summary

This Delphi study sought expert consensus on trauma indicators in autistic youth, recognizing that trauma sequelae may be under-recognized in this population. Seventy-two experts in autism and/or childhood trauma participated in a two-round survey evaluating 48-51 potential trauma indicators. Twenty-two indicators reached consensus (>75% endorsement), including traditional PTSD symptoms like intrusions, avoidance, and negative mood changes, but also autism-specific presentations such as increased reliance on others, adaptive and language regressions, self-injurious behavior, and non-suicidal self-injury. Experts emphasized the need for tailored diagnostic measures, developmentally informed criteria, and multiple informants to improve diagnostic accuracy in autistic youth.

Summary by AutismInsights from published abstract. This is not a substitute for reading the original paper.

Key findings

  • 1

    22 trauma indicators reached expert consensus (>75% agreement) for identifying traumatic reactions in autistic youth

    Confidence: moderateRelevance: Provides evidence-based framework for trauma assessment in autism
  • 2

    Autism-specific trauma presentations include increased reliance on others, adaptive and language regressions, and self-injurious behaviors

    Confidence: moderateRelevance: Highlights unique trauma manifestations requiring specialized assessment approaches
  • 3

    Traditional PTSD symptoms (intrusions, avoidance, negative mood changes) were also identified as important indicators

    Confidence: moderateRelevance: Confirms overlap between standard trauma presentations and autism-specific manifestations

Summary by AutismInsights from published abstract. This is not a substitute for reading the original paper.

Clinical implications

Clinicians should use tailored assessment approaches when evaluating trauma in autistic youth, incorporating both traditional PTSD criteria and autism-specific indicators. Assessment should involve multiple informants and developmentally appropriate measures to improve diagnostic accuracy and avoid under-recognition of trauma sequelae.

Summary by AutismInsights from published abstract. This is not a substitute for reading the original paper.

Limitations

This is a consensus study based on expert opinion rather than empirical data. The study does not provide information about the diagnostic accuracy or clinical utility of the identified indicators in real-world settings.

Summary by AutismInsights from published abstract. This is not a substitute for reading the original paper.

Original abstract

It has been suggested that the sequelae of trauma are under-recognized in youth on the autism spectrum. We aimed to generate expert consensus regarding important trauma indicators, including but not limited to traumatic stress symptoms, in autistic youth. We recruited 72 experts in autism and/or childhood trauma. Via a 2-round Delphi survey, experts commented on and rated the importance of 48 potential indicators, drawn from PTSD criteria and a broader literature on traumatic sequelae in autism.

A revised list of 51 indicators, 18 clinical guidelines developed from expert comments, and summaries of expert qualifications and ratings from Round 1 were submitted to a second round (n = 66; 92% retention) of expert review and rating. Twenty-two indicators reached consensus (>75% round 2 endorsement). Many, but not all, reflected PTSD criteria, including intrusions (e.g., trauma re-enactments in perseverative play/speech), avoidance of trauma-reminders, and negative alterations in mood/cognition (e.g., diminished interest in activities) and in arousal/reactivity (e.g., exaggerated startle). Experts also identified increased reliance on others, adaptive and language regressions, self-injurious behavior, and non-suicidal self-injury as important indicators.

Consensus guidelines emphasized the need for tailored measures, developmentally informed criteria, and multiple informants to increase diagnostic accuracy. Expert consensus emphasizes and informs a need for tailored diagnostic guidelines and measures to more sensitively assess traumatic reactions in autistic youth.

View Original Paper

View original paperFull paper via publisher (may require subscription)

Evidence Grade

Emerging

limited

Grade assigned by AutismInsights based on study type and published abstract.

Study Details

Journal
Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines
Year
2023
PMID
35817758
DOI
10.1111/jcpp.13666

MeSH Terms

AdolescentHumansDelphi TechniqueAutistic Disorder